Ragan Speechwriters Conference: what did it all mean?

Disclaimer: I work as a corporate speechwriter in a Silicon Valley high technology company. Most of the ‘speeches’ I write are a series of Power Point slides with speaking notes.

Given that perspective, here’s what I took away from the conference, and some suggestions on ways it might be improved in future.

Demographics: Baby boomer’s don’t retire, they just do freelance speechwriting

There were 250 registered attendees, and it looked like about 60% were male with a predominance of Boomer graybeards. More than one person commented that speechwriting was a ‘senior job’ and CEO’s want someone with experience they can trust. However, my colleague Russell had a conversation with the speechwriter for GM’s CEO who was a woman in her 20’s.

Question: what happens when this current generation of speechwriters retires?

Another question: what age are the speechwriters who support CEO’s like Sergey and Larry at Google? Do guys in their 20’s and 30’s running companies want someone writing their speeches who is old enough to be their father?

The attendees were overwhelmingly from North America. I met two women from The Netherlands and heard a couple of British accents but perhaps, like me, they live here.

Speechwriters: In love with the past, or looking to the future?

The graybeards love classical rhetoric. Many quoted Lincoln, FDR, JFK, MLK, Shakespeare, Robert Green Ingersoll and so on. It’s ironic that few of these masterful orators actually used the services of a speechwriter.

When the next generation of speechwriters comes along will they still look to the past for inspiration? Or will they look forward to messages that are crafted for an age of fragmented media?

Many of the “Greatsâ€? delivered speeches that were absorbed by an audience at one time (in Ingersoll’s case often two or more hours at one sitting). But who would listen to a two hour speech these days? How will messages be received in the future? Will we see more asynchronous communication via blogs, podcasts, streaming media archives? What will be the best way to achieve mind- and market-share with an audience that turns on, tunes in, tunes out, turns off? What do you write for an audience with one hand on the remote? When the keywords you meta-tag your transcripts with bring more web-surfers to the soundbites – what matters the rhetoric? (he asked rhetorically)

Ragan: The shoe-makers children?

Since much of the actual content of the presentations can be found in the many excellent books on the craft of speechwriting at your local Barnes & Nobel for $20, why pay $895 for a conference? And if you do pay that, do you have a right to expect a flawlessly run event? My minor quibbles include:

  • I was amazed to find that there were no audio recordings being made of the sessions with downloadable .mp3 files and transcripts for anyone who wanted access to conference proceedings, as the National Speakers Association does so well here.
  • There was more than one typo on handout material and overhead slides.
  • None of the presenters who used Power Point knew the simple trick of pressing the ‘b’ or ‘.’ key to force the screens to black and return the audiences attention to the podium.
  • A morning keynote was interrupted by a hotel employee hammering nails into the side wall.
  • There were no tables to write on in the second conference hall.
  • On the positive side:

  • This was a pleasant event to attend. Speechwriters are nice people who readily share tradecraft.
  • There was a good mix of beginners and experienced folks in the room.
  • There was a healthy mix of information on the techniques of speechwriting and the business aspects of making your living in the marketplace.
  • But I did find it embarrassing that some of the presenters were unable to practice what they preached in terms of rhetoric and speech delivery.

    Whither speechifying?

    Unlike dramatic shifts in the worlds of the music, art and literature there seems to have been no sea-change in effective rhetoric since the nineteenth century. When a speaker from the 1880’s is held up as an example to study, and speeches form Shakespeare are quoted with relish, whither speechifying?

    Modern writers must deal with the novel after Joyce and the poem after Ginsberg. Contemporary Artists must paint in a world turned upside down by Impressionism, Cubism and later movements. In the time Ingersoll was speaking, The Academy was refusing to exhibit Manet and since then the establishment has banned works ranging from Lady Chatterly to Howl.

    What paradigm shifts have we seen in the world of the public speaker? Why are we still recommending that speakers “Tell ’em what you’ll tell ’em; tell ’em and then tell ’em what you told ’em”. Is anyone listening any more?

    I’d like a future Ragan conference to bring in the rap singers, greeting card sloganeer’s, comedy writers, Hollywood script-meister’s, advertising executives, graffiti taggers, punks and poets who know how to create messages with impact.

    I’d like future conferences to feature presentations by people whose first language isn’t American English. Let’s hear from Japanese, Thai, Indian, European, Australian and Fijian speechwriters. Let’s especially hear from those British political speechwriters who cut their teeth on Prime Minister’s Question Time!

    I’d like to hear presentations on what it’s like to write a speech for the generals in Iraq; a political speech in both the Red and Blue States; for NGO’s like Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth. I’d like to hear from a Toastmaster Champion and the best the National Speakers Association has to offer.

    One great visionary who knows that communication ‘business as usual’ does not work anymore is the Wizard of Ads, Roy H. Williams. His Monday Morning Memo recently asked us to create speeches:

    …written in the vulnerable, candid style of a conversation between close friends. Their language isn’t aggressive and egocentric like advertising, but unguarded, playful and real. [These speeches] admit weaknesses, confess fears, and never try to impress. They speak to the [audience] in the language of a friend, rather than a pitchman. Does it surprise you that the natural response of the [audience] is to give you their trust? But here’s the bigger question: Do you have the courage to be a friend, tell the truth, and worry more about your [audience’s] happiness than your own?

    [Find and replace used to customize ‘advertising’ for ‘speechwriting’]

    Monsoon Wedding Eulogy

    Since much of what I prepare in my day job is delivered by senior executives who I enjoy close contact with, I feel safe from offshoring. At least, I did until I reached page 31 of The World is Flat on the plane ride home:

    Say you are running a company and you have been asked to give a speech and a PowerPoint presentation in two days. Your “remote executive assistant” in India, provided by Brickwork, will do all the research for you, create the PowerPoint presentation, and e-mail the whole thing to you overnight so that it is on your deck that day you have to deliver it.”


    Friedman says that where most of the research can be gleaned off the web and summarized in a standard format then the speechwriter who only offers this amount of value to an organization is ripe for offshoring… (gulp!).

    Let’s invite someone from Brickworks to the next conference – before they replace us all…

    2 Comments so far
    Leave a comment

    Very thought-provoking piece.
    Thanks!

    Jim Wills

    I’m part of that demographic you lamented not seeing enough of at this conference. While I am intrigued by your arguments for something more in line with the times, I’m hard pressed to discount either the lessons or the masters from our past. The potential of blogs, podcasting and the new media is undoubtedly huge and requires fundamental changes – changes in format, in design, in medium. Though young, I have the pleasure of being a student of history and a trained anthropologist. When you look at the history of public speaking, it is surprising how little has changed over thousands of years. The more I learn, the more I have realized the fundamentals of messaging remain the same. Our motivations, our passions, our methods of persuasion distill with amazing ease to concepts talked about 2,000 years ago. But, like the Dark Ages, it seems we may need to lose the learning of building arches before we realize their importance to architecture.



    Leave a comment
    Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

    (required)

    (required)