<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Executive Coaching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/2007/07/19/executive-coaching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/2007/07/19/executive-coaching/</link>
	<description>"...a new favorite blog for professional excellence in public speaking, speech-writing, and executive communications." - The Register, May 24, 2008</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TJ Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/2007/07/19/executive-coaching/#comment-51739</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/business-communication/executive-coaching/#comment-51739</guid>
		<description>I find that the easiest way to get a top executive trained or coached is not to use the word training. Training implies deficiencies or inadequacies. Instead, I use the word rehearsal. Everyone knows that Broadway stars rehearse, rock stars rehearse—so there is no threat to the ego. When training becomes “rehearsal” and is positioned as a perk, then it is far more likely to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that the easiest way to get a top executive trained or coached is not to use the word training. Training implies deficiencies or inadequacies. Instead, I use the word rehearsal. Everyone knows that Broadway stars rehearse, rock stars rehearse—so there is no threat to the ego. When training becomes “rehearsal” and is positioned as a perk, then it is far more likely to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/2007/07/19/executive-coaching/#comment-47017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/business-communication/executive-coaching/#comment-47017</guid>
		<description>Most people would think that it requires a person with a higher position to evaluate top managers. But for people on the top, guts is needed for employees to give an honest feedback to those people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people would think that it requires a person with a higher position to evaluate top managers. But for people on the top, guts is needed for employees to give an honest feedback to those people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/2007/07/19/executive-coaching/#comment-46900</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 03:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exec-comms.com/blog/business-communication/executive-coaching/#comment-46900</guid>
		<description>True. It's hard to give an honest feedback to top managers. This situation makes it awkward if someone will be willing to do it. It'll most likely create a different meaning for the other employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. It&#8217;s hard to give an honest feedback to top managers. This situation makes it awkward if someone will be willing to do it. It&#8217;ll most likely create a different meaning for the other employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.108 seconds -->
